| 1 |
La négation dans les langues créoles à base lexicale française : Constantes et Variations: pour une étude mircro-comparative des langues créoles
|
|
|
|
In: Langues créoles : description, analyse, didactisation et automatisation ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03510663 ; Renauld Govain. Langues créoles : description, analyse, didactisation et automatisation, Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée – PULM, 2021, 978-2-36781-376-9 (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 6 |
The Oxford Handbook of Negation
|
|
|
|
In: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03048311 ; Oxford University Press, 2020, ⟨10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198830528.001.0001⟩ (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 7 |
Editorial : What Are (Un)Acceptability and (Un)Grammaticality? How Do They Relate to One Another and to Interpretation?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 8 |
The Weak Island Effect of Floating Quantifiers
|
|
|
|
In: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 9 |
Georgian Complex Segments
|
|
|
|
In: North East Linguistics Society (2020)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 11 |
Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals ; Pragmatic abilities in bilinguals: The case of scalar implicatures
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1879-9264 ; Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01803048 ; Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2018, ⟨10.1075/lab.17017.dup⟩ (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 12 |
Organization and Independence or Interdependence? Study of the Neurophysiological Dynamics of Syntactic and Semantic Processing ...
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 13 |
Relating (Un)acceptability to Interpretation. Experimental Investigations on Negation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 14 |
English negative concord and double negation: The division of labor between syntax and pragmatics
|
|
|
|
In: Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; Vol 3 (2018): Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America; 53:1–15 ; 2473-8689 (2018)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 15 |
Double Negation in a Negative Concord language: An experimental investigation
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0024-3841 ; Lingua ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01158576 ; Lingua, Elsevier, 2015, 163, pp.75-107. ⟨10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.012⟩ (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 17 |
Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity.
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 1662-5161 ; Frontiers in Human Neuroscience ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01067818 ; Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Frontiers, 2014, 8, pp.163. ⟨10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163⟩ (2014)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
| 18 |
Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Many neurocognitive studies on the role of motor structures in action-language processing have implicitly adopted a “dictionary-like” framework within which lexical meaning is constructed on the basis of an invariant set of semantic features. The debate has thus been centered on the question of whether motor activation is an integral part of the lexical semantics (embodied theories) or the result of a post-lexical construction of a situation model (disembodied theories). However, research in psycholinguistics show that lexical semantic processing and context-dependent meaning construction are narrowly integrated. An understanding of the role of motor structures in action-language processing might thus be better achieved by focusing on the linguistic contexts under which such structures are recruited. Here, we therefore analyzed online modulations of grip force while subjects listened to target words embedded in different linguistic contexts. When the target word was a hand action verb and when the sentence focused on that action (John signs the contract) an early increase of grip force was observed. No comparable increase was detected when the same word occurred in a context that shifted the focus toward the agent's mental state (John wants to sign the contract). There mere presence of an action word is thus not sufficient to trigger motor activation. Moreover, when the linguistic context set up a strong expectation for a hand action, a grip force increase was observed even when the tested word was a pseudo-verb. The presence of a known action word is thus not required to trigger motor activation. Importantly, however, the same linguistic contexts that sufficed to trigger motor activation with pseudo-verbs failed to trigger motor activation when the target words were verbs with no motor action reference. Context is thus not by itself sufficient to supersede an “incompatible” word meaning. We argue that motor structure activation is part of a dynamic process that integrates the lexical meaning potential of a term and the context in the online construction of a situation model, which is a crucial process for fluent and efficient online language comprehension.
|
|
Keyword:
Neuroscience
|
|
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3978346
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00163
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
|
| 20 |
When and How is Concord preferred? An Experimental approach
|
|
|
|
In: Travaux du 19ème CIL | 19th ICL papers, Congrès International des Linguistes, Genève 20-27 Juillet 2013, International Congress of Linguists, Geneva 20-27 July 2013 [oral presentation in workshop: 120 Negation and polarity: interfaces and cognition (Pierre LARRIVÉE & Chungmin LEE)] ; 19th International Congress of Linguists (ICL) ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01146044 ; 19th International Congress of Linguists (ICL), Jul 2013, Genève, Switzerland. [34 p.] ; https://www.cil19.org/en/welcome/ (2013)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|
|
